Illustration of a professional SEO analyst viewing graphs showing keyword visibility loss after Google removed num=100 parameter.

Home | Technical SEO | 77% of Sites Lost Keyword Visibility After Google Removed num=100

77% of Sites Lost Keyword Visibility After Google Removed num=100

Caleb Nation

President and Digital Marketing Consultant at Nation Media Design.

What you'll learn?

The effects of removing Num=100 from how Google tracks data.

Read time

3 Minutes

Published

October 7, 2025

Google’s Framework: Understanding the num=100 Change

Google’s recent removal of the &num=100 parameter is creating seismic shifts in how SEO performance is measured across Search Console.

According to a dataset from Tyler Gargula, Director of Technical SEO at LOCOMOTIVE Agency, 87.7% of sites saw a drop in impressions, while 77.6% lost unique ranking terms.

This update has changed not only keyword counts but how ranking accuracy is represented. Short-tail and mid-tail keywords took the biggest hit, and many SEOs report cleaner—but smaller—datasets in Google Search Console.

Getting the Data Right: The Art and Science of SEO Reporting

At first glance, these drops may look alarming. But Google’s parameter removal is actually helping refine the integrity of SEO data.

Before the update, automated rank trackers and scrapers using the 100-page view setting artificially inflated impressions and distorted ranking averages.

Now, Google Search Console reports are more reflective of true searcher behavior, showing fewer inflated impressions but stronger accuracy for top-ranking terms.

By the numbers:

Impressions: 87.7% declined.
Query count: 77.6% fewer unique terms.
Rank shifts: More queries appearing in the top 3 and on page

Aligning Your Data with Real Search Intent

This change underscores a larger SEO truth: visibility metrics should follow intent, not illusion.

For businesses tracking SEO progress, the focus should shift from total query counts to the value of top-position visibility.
Reports may look weaker—but if those impressions are tied to higher-intent terms, your SEO is working better than it appears.

At Nation Media Design, we recommend:

Comparing GSC data against Google Analytics 4 conversions to gauge true value.
Tracking CTR, scroll depth, and conversion rate instead of raw impression totals.
Using SpyFu Kombat analysis to verify where ranking gaps truly exist.

Setting Realistic SEO Expectations in the Post-num=100 Era

Many brands are noticing average position spikes as desktop impressions decline. This isn’t a ranking collapse—it’s Google cleaning house.

Platforms like AccuRanker and Semrush have confirmed disruptions and are adjusting algorithms.

Industry experts, including Brodie Clark, noted that scraper-driven metrics may have been inflating visibility for years. With this adjustment, data now represents actual ranking positions, giving marketers a clearer baseline.

Technical Foundations: What SEOs Should Audit Now

In light of the change, technical SEO teams should:

Recalibrate dashboards to remove num=100 dependencies.
Update rank tracking tools or integrations with GA4 + GSC APIs.
Validate top-performing pages manually with Search Console filters.
Conduct a fresh keyword audit in SpyFu to confirm which terms genuinely drive clicks.

This ensures your next content optimization cycle is based on authentic engagement metrics, not inflated keyword lists.

Measuring Success with Accurate Data

Nation Media Design’s analytics framework emphasizes clarity over vanity metrics.

Here’s how to adapt:

Use Nation Media Dashboard FX to cross-analyze impression data with session behavior.
Identify which content truly converts.
Map organic visibility by search intent tier—Informational, Commercial, and Transactional.

Even as keyword counts drop, your quality traffic can rise—if measured correctly.